Log in

Subscriber Exclusive

Surprise repeals rule banning criticism at meetings

Posted 9/18/24

Speakers will now be able to legally criticize the Surprise City Council and its government officials during city council meetings.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Subscriber Exclusive

Surprise repeals rule banning criticism at meetings

Posted

Speakers will now be able to legally criticize the Surprise City Council and its government officials during city council meetings.

With little fanfare, the Surprise Council on Sept. 17 unanimously voted to repeal a rule that prohibited complaints against people within the city.

Rule 2(e) on Surprise’s “Rules for the Public at Council Meetings” in its Council Policies and Procedures Manual is now off the books.

“It’s pretty straightforward,” City Attorney Robert Wingo told the rest of the council about the agenda item.

Nobody on council commented on the item before voting on it, and nobody on the public spoke on the matter after several spoke out at the last council meeting.

The city will still be dealing with legal ramifications from the rule, which dates back to at least 2015, although city officials aren’t quite sure how and when it was enacted in the first place.

City activist Rebekah Massie is suing the city after she was arrested Aug. 20 when speaking out against a raise for Wingo during call to the public.

Rule 2(e) is on the form speakers must sign before addressing the council. Mayor Skip Hall referred to it as the reason he cut off Massie from finishing her comments.

When Massie refused to leave, Hall called for an officer to remove her from the speaker’s lectern. The arrest was captured on video and seen millions of times online.

Arizona state Sen. John Kavanagh last week called for a state investigation into Surprise’s policy, but also said he would drop his request to Attorney General Kris Mayes if Surprise voted on the action like it did on Tuesday.

Jason Stone can be reached at jstone@iniusa.org. We’d like to invite our readers to submit their civil comments, pro or con, on this issue. Email AZOpinions@iniusa.org.