Dover: ‘Extremism’ is talked about without clear definition

“Extremism” and “extremist” are terms used often in the media with regard to our political dialogue and reporting. Can anyone tell me what they mean? 

I know what a dog is. I know what a cat is. I don’t know what an “extremist” is, much less the practice of or political theory behind “extremism.”

As the term and its variations are used, they’re mostly couched as “right-wing extremist,” “extreme right” or “extreme left,” but what do they even mean? We are seldom given express context. You never hear, for example, that XYZ politician favors an “extreme” interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. I guess that’s because, unless you hate individual freedom and freedom from tyranny, there’s nothing “extreme” in that document, unless, of course, you’re a wannabe tyrant.

Often as not, someone or other is simply called an “extremist” without any relevant context. We’re just supposed to believe that whatever is deemed to be “extreme” is profoundly bad. Yet, it makes no sense without a reference to specifics. You might hear someone described as having “extreme” views, but then, the views aren’t explained, nor why they are bad for you. Again, what have you learned?

The terms are meaningless, because precisely what is “extreme” is never defined and itemized. I would find it all so much more understandable if these people would just tell us what, in terms of our lives, these things mean. As they use the terms, they are supposed somehow to be “bad,” but there’s never any discussion of why they are bad or what it means for us all. I’ve therefore come to understand, as much as I am able, that they are simply a coordinated method of media seeking to demean people and ideas without ever having to explain why.

Reader reactions, pro or con, are welcomed at AzOpinions@iniusa.org.