Sun City PCA bill dies in Senate, revived in House as striker

By Rusty Bradshaw
Independent Newsmedia

An Arizona bill designed to exempt the Recreation Centers of Sun City from a September 2018 order to operate under the state’s Planned Communities Act died in the Senate but was revived in the House in a last-minute move Monday.

The bill, which started as House Bill 2374, was passed by the House but did not get a hearing in the Senate Government Committee March 21. That meant the bill would not make it to the Senate floor for debate. Monday was the last day bills could be heard by the Senate.

Anne Ransall Stewart

However, District 21 Rep. Kevin Payne (R-Peoria) and District 21 Sen. Rick Gray (R-Sun City) reintroduced the bill in the House as a “strike everything” amendment to Senate Bill 1094. The striker is scheduled on the House Government Committee for a hearing 9 a.m. Thursday, March 28.

A “strike everything after the enacting clause” amendment (also referred to as a “strike everything” amendment or simply a “striker”) proposes to delete the entire text of the existing bill and substitute new language, essentially making it a completely different bill, possibly on an entirely different subject, according to a definition on the Arizona Legislature website, www.azleg.gov. These amendments are sometimes used to allow legislators to circumvent the deadlines on introduction of new legislation, deal with an issue that arises after the deadline or revive a bill that has previously been defeated, according to the website information.

The original bill, first introduced by Mr. Payne, and the striker are opposed by plaintiffs in the lawsuit that brought the September court ruling. Anne Randall Stewart, one of those plaintiffs, believes the striker bill was intended to fly under the radar.

“They hoped they would get this through without us knowing about it, like they were able to keep our people from testifying in the House committee,” she said this morning. “But we found out about it, and we’re going to fight it.”

Mr. Payne and Mr. Gray did not respond to email requests early this morning about the striker bill. RCSC officials stated in an email they had no comment on the development.

RCSC operates under Arizona Revised Statutes Title 10. The PCA is contained in ARS Title 33. RCSC officials claim if the recreation centers must follow the regulations in the PCA, Sun City may be in danger of losing its age restriction. Sun City is restricted to residents 55 and older. The community, in an unincorporated area of Maricopa County, was established in 1960 as an active adult community.

Some residents dispute RCSC officials’ claims the PCA would endanger the age overlay.

“We will not lose our age restricted status because of falling under it,” stated Bill Pearson, a Sun City resident and former RCSC board member, in a guest commentary submitted to Independent Newsmedia. “The Sun City Home Owners Association is responsible for the yearly accounting and monitoring of those living here. People already can buy at any age, we purchased our home when we were 51. We couldn’t live here until we turned 55. That stays the same under Title 33.”

Carole Martinez, who also served on the RCSC board, stated in a letter submitted to Independent there are 94 age restricted communities in Arizona and all but two of them operate under Title 33.

Carole Martinez

“None have gone out of business because of that,” she said.

One of those Title 33 age restricted communities is Sun City West, just a few miles from and patterned after Sun City by the same developer. However, RCSC officials believe the two communities have significant differences.

“There is no way of knowing what affect the act has had on Sun City West, but we do know that Sun City West is in many ways different than Sun City,” Joelyn Higgins, RCSC communications and marketing coordinator, stated in an email in early March.

RCSC officials further claim operating under the Planned Communities Act would force RCSC officials to grant recreational facilities access to owners younger than 55 and living outside the community. But Sun City resident Ben Roloff said RCSC can set policies that determine who can use the facilities. The Planned Communities Act includes wording that confirms that in a section covering rentals.

“If the planned community is an age restricted community, the member, the member’s agent or the tenant shall show a government issued identification that bears a photograph and that confirms that the tenant meets the community’s age restrictions or requirements,” as stated in the act.

Joelyn Higgins

According to RCSC officials, this provision is actually less restrictive than what RCSC currently requires — not only proof of age but proof of residency in the form of a lease or owner affidavit documents.

RCSC documents do require its members to meet the 55-plus age restrictions. However, not all Sun City property owners are members. According to corporate documents, “A Member must be an Owner 55 years of age or older and occupy the Sun City AZ property as his/her primary Arizona residence unless his/her other Arizona residence is farther than seventy-five (75) miles from Sun City AZ in which case the Owner(s) must provide proof that he/she occupies the Sun City AZ residence as well.”

Under the Planned Communities Act, all board and committee meetings must be open to residents and anyone designated, in writing, to be a resident’s representative. Under the act, RCSC can conduct closed door meetings under five specific discussion items — legal advice; pending or contemplated litigation; personal, health or financial information; job performance, health records or compensation of employees; and a member’s appeal of violation. Prior to going into a closed session, the board must identify the general nature of the discussion as defined by the five exceptions for closed meetings.

RCSC officials will consider a motion in its Thursday, March 28 meeting to eliminate the closed door work study sessions and conduct two open meetings per month. The RCSC board will also considering sweeping bylaw and board policy changes at the same meeting.

Mrs. Stewart believes some of the proposed bylaw changes are designed to circumvent the open meeting process RCSC officials are establishing.

The act also has provisions designed to make association records open to members or their designated representatives.

Regarding foreclosures, the statute prohibits the association from foreclosing on a property until a year of delinquency has passed or the amount owed reaches or exceeds $1,200, whichever comes first.

The statute also limits fees the association can charge for services relating to a sale of property to $400, which can be increased up to 20 percent per year but only if the fee was less than $400 prior to Jan. 1, 2010. The association can also charge a rush fee of $100 and an update fee of $50, if either is requested or needed.

The Planned Communities Act does not have a provision for a fee equivalent to RCSC’s preservation and improvement fee.



You are encouraged to leave relevant comments but engaging in personal attacks, threats, online bullying or commercial spam will not be allowed. All comments should remain within the bounds of fair play and civility. (You can disagree with others courteously, without being disagreeable.) Feel free to express yourself but keep an open mind toward finding value in what others say. To report abuse or spam, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box.