Log in

Election

Supreme Court rejects last Arizona lawsuit on 2020 election

Posted 5/3/21

PHOENIX — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday threw out what is likely the last legal challenge remaining about the choice of Arizona voters of Joe Biden for president.

Without comment, the …

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Election

Supreme Court rejects last Arizona lawsuit on 2020 election

Posted

PHOENIX — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday threw out what is likely the last legal challenge remaining about the choice of Arizona voters of Joe Biden for president.

Without comment, the justices refused to consider a request by Pinal County resident Staci Burk that she should be allowed to pursue her claims of evidence of election fraud. She wanted access to the ballots to prove that some were invalid.

The justices, however, never actually got to look at those claims. In fact, that wasn't even part of her petition to the high court.

What Ms. Burk wanted — and what the justices refused to grant her — is a hearing over the question of whether she was an "elector'' under Arizona law who had standing to bring such a claim in the first place. It was that lack of standing that allowed state courts, right up through the Arizona Supreme Court, to ignore her claims.

In her underlying claims, Ms. Burk alleged widespread fraud and improper tallying by voting machines. She also claims someone had flown a batch of ballots into Phoenix's Sky Harbor International Airport, some of which Ms. Burk said were taken to the Maricopa County ballot tabulation center.

Ms. Burk never got a hearing on her claims after her case was tossed last year by Pinal County Superior Court Judge Kevin White who concluded she had no legal right to sue because she did not fit the legal definition of "qualified elector.'' He said that was because she was not registered to vote in the 2020 race.

She charged that her registration had been illegally canceled and sought a hearing. But Judge White also found that Ms. Burk, who represented herself, waited too long to file suit.

The state's high court reached the same conclusion.
Chief Justice Robert Brutinel writing for himself and three other justices who reviewed the case, acknowledged that Ms. Burk contends that her registration was improperly canceled.

The justices did not rule on that nor even dispute her argument. But Justice Brutinel said it doesn't matter.

"She admits that she was well aware before the election that she would not be able to vote in the general election,'' the chief justice wrote. "There is nothing before the court to indicate that (Ms. Burk) timely contacted the appropriate authorities to correct any problems with her voter registration.''

There was no immediate comment from Ms. Burk.