Settlement moves Arizona closer to resuming executions

Independent Newsmedia
Posted 7/15/20

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich announced that his office has reached a settlement to conclude a lawsuit challenging the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry’s lethal injection procedures.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe.

For $5.99, less than 20 cents a day, subscribers will receive unlimited access to the website, including access to our Daily Independent e-edition, which features Arizona-specific journalism and items you can’t find in our community print products, such as weather reports, comics, crossword puzzles, advice columns and so much more six days a week.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Settlement moves Arizona closer to resuming executions

Posted

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich announced that his office has reached a settlement to conclude a lawsuit challenging the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry’s lethal injection procedures.

The settlement allows Arizona to move one step closer to resuming executions in the state, according to a release.

"Anti-death penalty activists continue to file lawsuit after lawsuit, attacking the court system and seeking retaliation against companies lawfully supplying execution drugs," Mr. Brnovich stated in the release. "Meanwhile, the victims' families continue to suffer as justice is further delayed. Enough is enough. Justice demands that the law be enforced and that those convicted of the ultimate crimes be held accountable for their gruesome acts."

The lawsuit, initiated by Arizona death row inmates and the First Amendment Coalition of Arizona in 2014, sought information about the identity of lethal injection drug suppliers, which is confidential under Arizona law. The lawsuit also sought to ensure that the public had a right to not only view but also hear the entirety of an execution.

The AG's Office achieved a major victory in the case at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, where the agency argued that the disclosure of the source of lethal injection drugs would make it impossible for ADCRR to obtain them because of concerted efforts by anti-death penalty advocates to harass and retaliate against suppliers, according to the release.

The ruling ensures that those who provide the supply of lethal injection drugs to the State of Arizona will remain confidential and protected from harassment or retaliation from anti-death penalty activists. The Ninth Circuit’s opinion alleviates any concern that a federal court will use the First Amendment as grounds to breach a supplier’s confidentiality, the release states.

As part of the settlement, ADCRR modified its execution protocol and will leave microphones turned on in the execution chamber during executions moving forward.

According to the release, 115 inmates are currently on death-row in Arizona and 20 of those inmates have fully exhausted their appeals. Some of the inmates committed their crimes in the 1970s and early 1980s.

Arizona has not conducted an execution since 2014, the release states. The AG's Office stands ready to request execution warrants for inmates when ADCRR provides notice that it has obtained lethal injection drugs and is prepared to resume executions.

This week, Mr. Brnovich sent a follow-up letter to Gov. Doug Ducey, once again urging him to obtain pentobarbital to allow Arizona to resume executions by lethal-injection. Mr. Brnovich sent his original letter in July 2019.

The U.S. Supreme Court confirmed this week pentobarbital is widely conceded to be able to render a person fully insensate and does not carry the risks of pain that some have associated with other lethal injection protocols, according to a release.  See Barr v. Lee, No. 20A8 (U.S. July 14, 2020).
 
A copy of the dismissal can be viewed here.

Comments