Log in

Report Inappropriate Comments

I’m sorry, but who are you and why should we listen to or believe anything you have to say? The only time I’ve seen your name has been on NextDoor where you voice your support for every single project that comes up without being able to respond to basic questions about water and infrastructure. Water will be a problem but no one is going to admit it until we are at a crisis point. Scottsdale has already had to cut Rio Verde off. But sure, there’s no water problem even if the drought lasts forever right? Let’s not talk about the fact that Pinal county has halted all residential building due to the water shortage that you deny.

This is city council. It is NOT partisan. You bringing up irrelevant issues that half the country agreed with Barry on does nothing to make you a more credible source of information and just shows your ignorance.

You can’t answer a question with a straight answer yet Barry is soft? You sir, did an extreme disservice to yourself and the rest of Scottsdale by stooping so low and writing this hit piece. What would have helped your fellow citizens (I assume that’s what you’ll claim your intent is) far more than attacking and lying would have been by going directly to the candidate and getting your answers there. But I guess that wouldn’t have left you any hate to spew.

Your quote “ It’s estimated that in Scottsdale an additional 50,000 units are needed for population growth” is a straight up lie (or you have comprehension problems). Those 50,000 apartments is what a MF housing lobbyist told city council we were to build and PAY FOR. It didn’t go over well. There’s a video. I’d tell you to go fact check yourself, but it’s very clear you don’t care about facts, just typical rhetoric.

You know who consistently talks about “quality growth” with no definition? Solange. You just did the same yourself by saying we need “appropriate” growth without defining what that is.

Your claim that Barry has little development experience even after he’s been on the planning committee implies that you have more, which makes your agenda crystal clear.

From: Fishman: A candidate without ideas or experience

Please explain the inappropriate content below.